<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EchoTech &#187; iTunes App Store for Mac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/tag/itunes-app-store-for-mac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.echo-technology.co.uk</link>
	<description>technology blogging for the moribund</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 12:35:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Apple&#8217;s Misdirection? [Updated]</title>
		<link>http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/2009/11/17/apples-misdirection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/2009/11/17/apples-misdirection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Stelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appy Go Lucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes App Store for Mac]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/?p=333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the last year this blog has argued the case for Apple&#8217;s mobile device strategy, I think this post sums it up nicely.
However, while I and every other tech journalist and blogger have been concentrating on the hardware, Apple has been secretly (duh!) plotting its most audacious product to-date.

NB: This is simply speculation, if anyone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.echo-technology.co.uk%2F2009%2F11%2F17%2Fapples-misdirection%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.echo-technology.co.uk%2F2009%2F11%2F17%2Fapples-misdirection%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p>Over the last year this blog has argued the case for Apple&#8217;s mobile device strategy, I think <a href="http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/2009/08/01/apple-tablet-—-the-digital-watch-of-2010/">this post</a> sums it up nicely.</p>
<p>However, while I and every other <a href="http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&#038;rls=en&#038;q=apple+tablet&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;oe=UTF-8">tech journalist and blogger</a> have been concentrating on the hardware, Apple has been secretly (duh!) plotting its most audacious product to-date.<br />
<span id="more-333"></span><br />
<em>NB: This is simply speculation, if anyone at Apple is reading this please don&#8217;t blacklist me I have <a href="http://www.appygolucky.co.uk/profanity/">Apps to sell.</a></em></p>
<p>Remember what everyone said about the iPod? Overpriced, under powered. Remember what everyone said about the iPhone? Overpriced, underpowered, crappy network. What will they say about the Tablet/Slate? <em>Overpriced! underpowered!</em> Can you seen the pattern?</p>
<p> But what made people buy these slow and expensive gadgets — especially when there were obviously superior competitors? <strong>iTunes.</strong> You heard me, <em>iTunes</em>, I&#8217;m no fan — believe me. Even on the Mac is a painful, bloated experience and I&#8217;ve heard on Windows is enough to dive you insane. But the <em>infrastructure</em> is what matters.</p>
<p>The humble iPod (later the iPod Classic) had one competitive advantage; a simple, (relatively) cheap and legal way to buy music. The iPhone now has 100,000+ Apps many free (FREE!) and <a href="http://www.appygolucky.co.uk/profanity/">many pointless</a>. But it has an eco-system, and Apple own the infrastructure.</p>
<p>How will this help the iDevice/SteveSlate/WebBook? Applications. Not Apps. Not Widgets. Applications, fully functioning multi-featured Applications. Like <a href="http://www.atebits.com/tweetie-mac/">Tweetie for Mac</a> or any of the excellent <a href="http://www.ambrosiasw.com/">games form Ambrosia</a>. </p>
<p>Apple is going to do for regular software what it&#8217;s done for mobile Apps. The same walled garden, with the same terrible approval process and the same $99/year fee.</p>
<p>And as a software developer, I can&#8217;t wait. Being listed on the <strong>iTunes App Store for Mac</strong> will be a sign of quality and a guarantee to users of no viruses or Trojans.</p>
<p>Developers will be able to sell more applications and make more money. Users will have access to 1000s of Apps all with a &#8216;guarantee&#8217; of quality and all in one place, rated and reviewed. Apple will be happy because it will totally own the device.</p>
<p>The process for developers will be easy, download a provisioning profile form <a href="http://developer.apple.com/">ADC</a>, recompile your application, submit to Apple (wait 4 weeks) and bingo, your application is in front of 20 million people.</p>
<p>So, while we have all been arguing about hardware specs, Apple have been <a href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/06/03/its-official-apple-to-north-carolina/">building data centres</a> and working on iTunes X (10). </p>
<p>This will change the way software is sold (certainly on the Mac) and hand Apple a massive piece of the pie. Microsoft have been trying to do this for years, but Apple have almost stumbled upon it. But I can&#8217;t help wondering if <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kN0SVBCJqLs">Steve had this in-mind back in 2001</a>?</p>
<p>Recently Phil Schiller has defended the current App Store:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We&#8217;ve built a store for the most part that people can trust,&#8221; he says. &#8220;You and your family and friends can download applications from the store, and for the most part they do what you&#8217;d expect, and they get onto your phone, and you get billed appropriately, and it all just works.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I think this adds weight to my argument, Apple want to build a closed, secure eco-system. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/2009/11/17/apples-misdirection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
