<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EchoTech &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.echo-technology.co.uk</link>
	<description>technology blogging for the moribund</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 12:35:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>New Google Search Commands</title>
		<link>http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/2008/11/13/new-google-search-commands/</link>
		<comments>http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/2008/11/13/new-google-search-commands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Stelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spelling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the original post is started to write when I went on a rant about Google Search killers, sorry about that. Here is a more succinct post abut what I&#8217;d like Google to provide.
Power Search
Let me know in the comments of power search features you&#8217;d like, but 2 that would be useful for me [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.echo-technology.co.uk%2F2008%2F11%2F13%2Fnew-google-search-commands%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.echo-technology.co.uk%2F2008%2F11%2F13%2Fnew-google-search-commands%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p>This is the original post is started to write when I went on a rant about Google Search killers, sorry about that. Here is a more succinct post abut what I&#8217;d like Google to provide.<span id="more-57"></span></p>
<h2>Power Search</h2>
<p>Let me know in the comments of power search features you&#8217;d like, but 2 that would be useful for me would be; &#8216;ip4:&#8217; and &#8216;ip6:&#8217;. A query of:</p>
<pre>ip4:17.149.160.49</pre>
<p>This would return results form this IP address 17.149.160.49 (&#8217;ip6:&#8217; is the IPv6 equivalent).</p>
<h2>Spell Checker</h2>
<p>As you might of guessed my speling sux. It&#8217;s a combination poor typing skills and dyslexia. So the thing I love most about computers is the spell checker. Apple make my life easier too by providing a build in spell checker for any Cocoa application. But by far an away the best spell checker I have ever used is Google, so much so that I will often find at the end of a day 10 or so window open with search for; &#8216;avaibule&#8217;, &#8217;sussinct&#8217; or &#8216;priverlage&#8217;.</p>
<p>A handy widget or API for this would make me happier than a gay dyslexic at a pianist convention.</p>
<h2>Upgrades</h2>
<p>There is a lot of technology in Google that doesn&#8217;t quite work. Take the &#8216;related:&#8217; command, supposedly it list pages and site that are, well, related to a site you specify. It only works for a handful of sites and then with curious results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/2008/11/13/new-google-search-commands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Satanic Sheep or maybe the Scientologists</title>
		<link>http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/2008/01/29/satanic-sheep-or-maybe-the-scientologists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/2008/01/29/satanic-sheep-or-maybe-the-scientologists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Stelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/2008/01/29/satanic-sheep-or-maybe-the-scientologists/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This &#8220;circle of sheep&#8221; photographed by a walker in the English country side. Related to crop circles? Satanic rituals? Scientologists? You decide. 

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.echo-technology.co.uk%2F2008%2F01%2F29%2Fsatanic-sheep-or-maybe-the-scientologists%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.echo-technology.co.uk%2F2008%2F01%2F29%2Fsatanic-sheep-or-maybe-the-scientologists%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p>This &#8220;circle of sheep&#8221; photographed by a walker in the English country side. Related to crop circles? Satanic rituals? Scientologists? You decide.<span id="more-9"></span> </p>
<p><img src="http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/images/sheep.jpg" alt="Satanic Sheep" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/2008/01/29/satanic-sheep-or-maybe-the-scientologists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
