<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EchoTech &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/category/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.echo-technology.co.uk</link>
	<description>technology blogging for the moribund</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 12:35:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>New Google Search Commands</title>
		<link>http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/2008/11/13/new-google-search-commands/</link>
		<comments>http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/2008/11/13/new-google-search-commands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Stelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spelling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the original post is started to write when I went on a rant about Google Search killers, sorry about that. Here is a more succinct post abut what I&#8217;d like Google to provide.
Power Search
Let me know in the comments of power search features you&#8217;d like, but 2 that would be useful for me [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.echo-technology.co.uk%2F2008%2F11%2F13%2Fnew-google-search-commands%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.echo-technology.co.uk%2F2008%2F11%2F13%2Fnew-google-search-commands%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p>This is the original post is started to write when I went on a rant about Google Search killers, sorry about that. Here is a more succinct post abut what I&#8217;d like Google to provide.<span id="more-57"></span></p>
<h2>Power Search</h2>
<p>Let me know in the comments of power search features you&#8217;d like, but 2 that would be useful for me would be; &#8216;ip4:&#8217; and &#8216;ip6:&#8217;. A query of:</p>
<pre>ip4:17.149.160.49</pre>
<p>This would return results form this IP address 17.149.160.49 (&#8217;ip6:&#8217; is the IPv6 equivalent).</p>
<h2>Spell Checker</h2>
<p>As you might of guessed my speling sux. It&#8217;s a combination poor typing skills and dyslexia. So the thing I love most about computers is the spell checker. Apple make my life easier too by providing a build in spell checker for any Cocoa application. But by far an away the best spell checker I have ever used is Google, so much so that I will often find at the end of a day 10 or so window open with search for; &#8216;avaibule&#8217;, &#8217;sussinct&#8217; or &#8216;priverlage&#8217;.</p>
<p>A handy widget or API for this would make me happier than a gay dyslexic at a pianist convention.</p>
<h2>Upgrades</h2>
<p>There is a lot of technology in Google that doesn&#8217;t quite work. Take the &#8216;related:&#8217; command, supposedly it list pages and site that are, well, related to a site you specify. It only works for a handful of sites and then with curious results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/2008/11/13/new-google-search-commands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Search 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/2008/11/13/google-search-20/</link>
		<comments>http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/2008/11/13/google-search-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Stelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Corp.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently had an discussion* with a colleague about why Google rules the internet. We were having our bi-monthly discussion (like all start ups do) about how we&#8217;d love to launch a search company; &#8220;we&#8217;d do it some much better&#8221;, &#8220;our interface will be way cool&#8221;, &#8220;think of the money&#8221;. 
&#8220;A little top down thinking about crazy projects is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.echo-technology.co.uk%2F2008%2F11%2F13%2Fgoogle-search-20%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.echo-technology.co.uk%2F2008%2F11%2F13%2Fgoogle-search-20%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p>I recently had an discussion* with a colleague about why <a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> rules the internet. We were having our bi-monthly discussion (like all start ups do) about how we&#8217;d love to launch a search company; &#8220;we&#8217;d do it some much better&#8221;, &#8220;our interface will be way cool&#8221;, &#8220;think of the money&#8221;. <span id="more-39"></span></p>
<blockquote><p><span class="bqstart">&#8220;</span>A little top down thinking about crazy projects is light relief in these hard times and I actively encourage it, my secret hope it it might plant the seed of a future project the will wipe out my student loan once and for all.</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;">My argument was along the lines of, 1. Anyone can collect data and store it for search and 2. What makes Google the best is the way the molest your query and give you what you want not what you asked for. This is why when you type in &#8220;june sarpong&#8221; you don&#8217;t get any calendars or things happening in June. This, my argument continued was the USP the thing no one else did as well or at all.</p>
<blockquote><p><span class="bqstart">&#8220;</span>What You Want, Not What You Think You Want should be Google&#8217;s new mantra they could shorten it to they snappy WYWNWYTYW, say it with me, W, Y, W, N, W, Y, T, Y, W!</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;d think with Microsoft desperate to get any sort of traction with their online real-estate, Yahoo! Fucked! they would e trying hard to out do Google in the search space. This week however I was checking the server logs (as I do every Monday morning) and I noticed something strange, Google as usual was the Number 1 spider on our servers but second was <a href="http://www.cuil.com">Cuil</a>! Imagine my surprise.</p>
<blockquote><p><span class="bqstart">&#8220;</span>Figures from Net Applications show that Cuil had a market share of less than 0.01 per cent in October.</p></blockquote>
<p>Microsoft and Yahoo! the respective Number Twos in online search aren&#8217;t even out-indexing a poxy start up like Cuil. You might not be able to compete on search power but at least have the courtesy to provide you dwindling user base with up-to-date results!</p>
<blockquote><p><span class="bqstart">&#8220;</span>Google&#8217;s profits were up 17% to $1.21bn (£608m) for the three months to the end of December, 2007.</p></blockquote>
<div>So where does this leave us &#8211; as predicted will the true Google killer come form the garage of some crazies who left cushy jobs at Google to go-it-alone. Or will the blunt sledge hammer of Microsoft monopoly slowly chip away at Google until we left with nothing but dust. Who knows, but I do know this; Google better spruce up their search or history might just repeat it self.  </p>
<p><em>*argument.</em></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/2008/11/13/google-search-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
