<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EchoTech &#187; MacTouch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/category/apple/mactouch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.echo-technology.co.uk</link>
	<description>technology blogging for the moribund</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 12:35:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>iPhone OS 4.0 aka Mac OS X Touch 1.0 [updated x4]</title>
		<link>http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/2010/01/05/iphone-os-4-0-aka-mac-os-x-touch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/2010/01/05/iphone-os-4-0-aka-mac-os-x-touch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Stelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacTouch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iSlate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cocoa Touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone OS 4.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X Touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebKit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/?p=371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time to jump on the rumour mill and predict, with scary accuracy what Apple&#8217;s event due to take place at the end of January (&#8217;10), will hold.
Update: Looks like once again I have been spot on with my Apple predictions. I have linked to stories confirming my assertions where appropriate.

Mac OS X Touch
The new name [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.echo-technology.co.uk%2F2010%2F01%2F05%2Fiphone-os-4-0-aka-mac-os-x-touch%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.echo-technology.co.uk%2F2010%2F01%2F05%2Fiphone-os-4-0-aka-mac-os-x-touch%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p>Time to jump on the rumour mill and predict, with <a href="http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/category/apple/">scary accuracy</a> what <a href="http://apple.com">Apple&#8217;s</a> <em>event</em> due to take place at the end of January (&#8217;10), will hold.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> Looks like once again I have been spot on with my Apple predictions. I have linked to stories confirming my assertions where appropriate.</p>
<p><span id="more-371"></span></p>
<h2>Mac OS X Touch</h2>
<p>The new name for iPhone OS. Currently the iPhone OS runs on iPhone&#8217;s, iPod&#8217;s and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPhone_OS#iPhone_SDK">inside developers Mac Pro&#8217;s</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time for a name change — <strong>Mac OS X Touch 1.0</strong>.  It will effectively be iPhone OS 4.0, we might get a few 3.x updates to smooth the transition but by the end of 2010 iPhone OS will be dead — <em>Long live Mac OS X Touch</em>.</p>
<h2>Features</h2>
<p>These features all taken form my musings on <a href="http://twitter.com/rjstelling">Twitter</a>.</p>
<h3>Naming</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>UPDATE</strong>: Touch OS 4.0</li>
<li><strong>UPDATE</strong>: Mac Touch OS 4.0</li>
</ul>
<h3>API</h3>
<ul>
<li>Voice Control API</li>
<li>Low level camera API</li>
<li>Bluetooth API</li>
<li>launchd API (instead of multi-process support)</li>
<li>Data detectors API</li>
<li>Advanced gesture API</li>
<li>Advanced iSync API (for 3rd parties)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Updates</h3>
<ul>
<li>USB support (for iSlate)</li>
<li>Extra non-standard WebKit extentions
</li>
<li><strong>Definitely</strong> no Flash support
</li>
<li>Multi-camera support (see Apps below)
</li>
<li>Video output</li>
<li><del datetime="2010-04-06T12:32:22+00:00">Handwriting recognition</del></li>
</ul>
<h3>Interface Updates</h3>
<ul>
<li>Animated springboard icons</li>
<li>Advanced App management</li>
<li>Lock App positions in springboard</li>
</ul>
<h3>Apps</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>RELEASED</strong>: iWork App (instead of file system) [<a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2010/01/09/apple-working-on-advanced-gesturing-and-multi-touch-version-of-iwork/">MacRumours.com</a>] [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/10/01/09/apple_tablet_may_ship_with_multi_touch_version_of_iwork.html">AppleInsider</a>]</li>
<li>iChat [<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2010/01/11/france-telecom-orange-apple-tablet/">Orange Exec Confirms Apple Tablet Is On The Way</a>]</li>
<li><strong>UPDATE</strong>: Remote Desktop App (iPad Only)</li>
<li><strong>UPDATE</strong>: Apple TV App (iPad Only)</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/2010/01/05/iphone-os-4-0-aka-mac-os-x-touch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MacWorld &#8216;08 Predictions</title>
		<link>http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/2008/01/10/macworld-08-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/2008/01/10/macworld-08-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Stelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blu-Ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacTouch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacWorld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penryn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/2008/01/10/macworld-08-predictions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are two reasons I am writing yet another hackneyed MacWorld prediction entry:

I always get it right but never tell anyone 
Cash in on all the loverly Apple keywords, like sub-notebook, MacTouch and new iPhone

With all that unpleasantness over with I can begin. We all know Mr Jobs prides him self on secrecy and clandestine projects but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.echo-technology.co.uk%2F2008%2F01%2F10%2Fmacworld-08-predictions%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.echo-technology.co.uk%2F2008%2F01%2F10%2Fmacworld-08-predictions%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p>There are two reasons I am writing yet another hackneyed <a href="http://www.macworld.com" target="_blank">MacWorld</a> prediction entry:</p>
<ol>
<li>I always get it right but never tell anyone<span style="white-space: pre"> </span></li>
<li>Cash in on all the loverly Apple keywords, like sub-notebook, <span style="font-style: italic">MacTouch</span> and new <span style="font-style: italic">iPhone</span></li>
</ol>
<p>With all that unpleasantness over with I can begin. We all know Mr Jobs prides him self on secrecy and clandestine projects but the simple fact is Apple is a business and needs to make money and a quick look over their aging product line tell us 90% of the keynote.<span id="more-5"></span></p>
<h2>Preemptive Strike   </h2>
<p>As to ruin the narrative of this entry Apple have this week released update Xserves and Mac Pros. I won&#8217;t insult your intelligence dear reader with the pretense that, if I had written this entry last month I would of predicted these update before January 12th. But I would of. <br />
So, one nil to me. Ok one all. </p>
<h2>Portable Success</h2>
<p>Lets start off with what has over the last 3 year become the bed rock of Apple&#8217;s resurgence, the MacBook Pro. The MacBook line is in desperate need of a make over but it the Pro version that you can bet the farm on.<br />
Intel announced new processors (immediately incorporated into the Desktop and Server lines) so we can reason the MacBook Pro updates will be more significant. But how significant? I&#8217;m going to stick my neck out and list all the updates I expect to see:</p>
<ol>
<li>Processor upgrade (duh!) &#8211; 45-nm Penryn procesors at 2.4GHz to 2.8GHz<span style="white-space: pre"> </span></li>
<li>Graphics upgrade &#8211; an NVIDIA with 256MB as standard up to 512MB in top models </li>
<li>Thinner enclosure &#8211; not by much maybe 20%-25%<span style="white-space: pre"> </span></li>
<li>LED backlight screen &#8211; I&#8217;m just jumping on the bandwagon with this<span style="white-space: pre"> </span></li>
<li>Longer battery life &#8211; nothing revolutionary here, all down to the processors and screen<span style="white-space: pre"> </span></li>
<li>Gesture Pad &#8211; enhanced and much bigger track pad that will respond like the iPhone interface with; stretching, pinching, scrolling and all that CoverFlow goodness.<span style="white-space: pre"> </span></li>
<li>Blu-Ray Drive &#8211; high end models only or possibly on a &#8216;built to order&#8217; only option<span style="white-space: pre"> </span></li>
<li>Mac OS X 10.5.2 &#8211; like shooting fish in a barrel!</li>
</ol>
<p>So, 8 prediction for the MacBook Pro &#8211; check back after the Keynote to see how I scored. What this will mean for the more consumer focused MacBook it&#8217;s hard to say, but here we go:<span style="white-space: pre"> </span><span style="white-space: pre"> </span></p>
<ol>
<li>Processor upgrade<span style="white-space: pre"> </span></li>
<li>Screen upgrade<span style="white-space: pre"> </span></li>
<li>Price drop</li>
</ol>
<p>Only time will tell, but I don&#8217;t expect anything more than modest upgrades to the MacBooks. The upgrades will only bring the low end portables in line with the new Sub-Notebook and help define the product lines.<br />
The real interesting thing about the new portable is its name. Looking back over the product lines we can surmise it will follow the Apple convention and take the moniker of Mini, Nano or Touch. These are surly different beasts.<br />
The MacBook Mini/Nano &#8211; a sub-notebookw with 13&#8243; screen no internal optical drive, SSD hard disk and about a micron thick.<br />
The Mac Touch &#8211; the long rumored and tablet Mac, all kinds of wireless including GMS/GPRS  and WiMax but only a 64GB SSD hard drive. It wont be locked to a carrier like the iPhone but will take an optional SIM card for true mobility. It&#8217;s just a big fat iPhone.</p>
<h2>Don&#8217;t Touch</h2>
<p> <br />
I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;re be seeing the Mac Touch this time, mainly because of the same confusion you found when reading the previous paragraph and I felt writing it. To be a success it has to have so much and still I can see no market. It would just be too expensive.</p>
<h2>Less is More</h2>
<p> <br />
So that leaves us with the The MacBook Mini/Nano &#8211; we have a Mac Mini so to avoid the confusion The MacBook Nano will be born. As far a product positioning is concerned the MacBook Nano will sit between the MacBook and MacBook Pro and be priced accordingly. Below is a list of of expected features (by no means exhaustive): <span style="white-space: pre"> </span></p>
<ol>
<li>13&#8243; Screen, LED backlight<span style="white-space: pre"> </span></li>
<li>64GB &#8211; 128GB SSD hard drive<span style="white-space: pre"> </span></li>
<li>1GB RAM<span style="white-space: pre"> </span></li>
<li>Touch interface/Trackpad similar to the new MacBook Pro&#8217;s<span style="white-space: pre"> </span></li>
<li>WiFi &#8211; all flavors a/b/g/n <span style="white-space: pre"> </span></li>
<li>USB 2.0 &#8211; possibly mini-USB<span style="white-space: pre"> </span></li>
<li>Very thin &#8211; is this a feature?<span style="white-space: pre"> </span></li>
<li>45-nm Penryn processor at 2.1GHz<span style="white-space: pre"> </span></li>
<li>Non-removable battery (but it lasts 12 hours)<span style="white-space: pre"> </span> </li>
<li>Mac OS X 10.5.2<span style="white-space: pre"> </span></li>
<li>iPod style universal docking port<span style="white-space: pre"> </span></li>
<li> Multi-Colourd &#8211; Apple uses this neat trick to reinvigorate &#8216;old&#8217; lines, expect this on updated MacBooks too.</li>
</ol>
<p>Wow! It&#8217;s like I have a crystal ball. Well, that&#8217;s not all we still have the Apple TV and Mac Mini to look at. This is where my predictions tend towards guess work as opposed to the well thought out and meticulously researched prose above.<br />
I can however, say with some degree of certainty that if the Apple TV is not update next week, it&#8217;s dead. If it does get a second bite at the home entertainment cherry it will see a <span style="font-weight: bold">MAJOR</span> upgrade; more Mac OS X like features, Safari, Blu-Ray (you heard me right!), bigger hard drive and iPod dock.</p>
<h2>Mini Minor</h2>
<p> <br />
I have even less of an idea about the Mac Mini &#8211; they are great, I&#8217;d love to see an upgrade and a price drop. But the updated Apple TV might just incorporate all the features.<br />
So there you go, 100% guaranteed to happen next week* or never. Please feel free to rant about how wrong I am going to be &#8211; I will be publishing the emails of those that make fools of them selves.<br />
One last thing&#8230; iPhone update, a new 16GB version followed by a modest price drop, oh and a iPhone Nano. <span style="font-style: italic">* Not a guarantee.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.echo-technology.co.uk/2008/01/10/macworld-08-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
